|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Jeremy "UncleHoot" Praay" <jer### [at] questsoftware cmo> wrote in message
news:4a27cd55$1@news.povray.org...
[...]
> In an alternate universe, here's how things could have gone:
> "Dad, I want that song."
> "Ok honey, let's check iTunes... It's not on the iTunes US site, but they
> say that for $2.99, we can download it from iTunes in Japan. Let's just
pay
> $2.99 for it."
> "Thank you father! I love you so much! And I love my iPod too!"
> "Me too, honey. Me too..."
> *Hugs*
In a yet another alternative universe, it would have been a perfect
opportunity to teach a youngster that one may not always be able to get what
she wants.
Philosophical question: Are we entitled to be able to have access to any art
on any device so long as it technically possible? Do not the decisions of a
vendor/copyright holder count for anything, even when they may be perceived
as arbitrary?
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |